The synthesis and translation of rigorous scientific evidence to inform AMR policy and practice is essential for effective global action to address AMR. Researchers In 2019, the United Nations’ Interagency Coordination Group for Antimicrobial Resistance identified three bodies needed to support global efforts to address AMR: the Global Leaders Group (GLG), the AMR Multi-Stakeholder Partnership Platform (MSPP) […]
Despite the serious implications of gendered inequities, there is little research on the intersection of gender and AMR, and very few NAPs mention gender or include gender considerations.
How has the COVID-19 pandemic impacted antimicrobial use (AMU) and antimicrobial resistance (AMR)? As more data become available, the picture is becoming clearer.
Can WHO’s pandemic instrument be designed to address a wider range of pandemic threats? The Policy Accelerator advises on how the pandemic instrument could be made more comprehensive.
Antimicrobial resistance has generated an unprecedented amount of global attention since the launch of the Global Action Plan on AMR. Our research explores how global commitments on AMR have changed and adapted since 2015.
The Paris Agreement successfully mobilized collective action to protect a shared global common-pool resource and mitigate and adapt to the impacts of climate change. What are the takeaways for managing AMR?
What do researchers from the disciplines of law, anthropology, history, public health, public policy, economics, and veterinary medicine contribute to the debate about addressing AMR in the pandemic instrument? Explore this special issue of the Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics.
A partnership of world leading social science research centres has come together to develop global governance strategies to tackle AMR. This partnership brings together experts in economics, ethics, evaluation, evidence synthesis, gender analysis, law, political science, and veterinary science.